USA: 1/2 cent 1804, km33, different « 4 » / stems / spiked chin

Pubblicazioni di 6 • visto 36 volte
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16948.html



I think we have to have year lines added with "All kinds", when more than one year line to assure the mintage is for the year group. For the 1804 the "wreath" has to be taken out from one of the lines.

I would be glad to read your comments on this? Thank you so much.
Globetrotter
Coin varieties in French:
https://monnaiesetvarietes.numista.com
Similar comment as in the past. Year lines and graphics should use the same terminology.
Graphic: WITH STEMS/NO STEMS
Year lines: stems/stemless

I agree with your other comments.
Cita: "rsirian1"​Similar comment as in the past. Year lines and graphics should use the same terminology.
​Graphic: WITH STEMS/NO STEMS
​Year lines: stems/stemless

​I agree with your other comments.
​Because my spelchecker doesn't like stemless I used no stems, thinking stemless is not a valid word although very understandable? But I see it is a real so we should go for "stems" and "stemless", I think?
Globetrotter
Coin varieties in French:
https://monnaiesetvarietes.numista.com
Globetrotter
Coin varieties in French:
https://monnaiesetvarietes.numista.com
Cita: "Sjoelund"
Cita: "rsirian1"​Similar comment as in the past. Year lines and graphics should use the same terminology.
​​Graphic: WITH STEMS/NO STEMS
​​Year lines: stems/stemless
​​
​​I agree with your other comments.
​​Because my spelchecker doesn't like stemless I used no stems, thinking stemless is not a valid word although very understandable? But I see it is a real so we should go for "stems" and "stemless", I think?
To be honest, I like with stems/no stems better but I think it's better to stick with the Red Book's (and SCWC) stems/stemless.
I'll launch the 1805 in another thread now.
Globetrotter
Coin varieties in French:
https://monnaiesetvarietes.numista.com

» Politica del Forum

Il fuso orario utilizzato è UTC+2:00.
L'ora attuale è 14:59.