Others are fixed.
» Accesso rapido all'ultima pubblicazione
Trooper8
One that wasn't done by bad referees, so I'm posting it:
Still not resolved after 2 “fixes” in the last 1.5 months.
Jarcek
maneeshks
Please merge:
1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah , N# 210227
into
8 Gani - Qutb Ud Din Mubarak Shah, N# 155682
Both have a reference to GG# D271, which is a Billon coin.
The first one (1 Yakgani) shows it as a copper coin. The second one is correctly shown as a Billon coin.
Isn't just first (copper one) wrongly referenced?
The first one (1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah , N# 210227) mentions copper, 2.96g, 14mm, 2.6mm thickness.
There are 4 copper coins listed for Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah in Gordon & Goenka (GG), none of which are listed in Numista catalogue -
a. GG# D280 - Paika - 4.6g
b. GG# D281 - 'Adli (half paika) Hadrat Dar al-Khilafa - 2.2g
c, GG# D282 - 'Adli Qutbabad - 2.2g
d. GG# D283 - Visva (one-fifth paika) - 0.8g
The weights of these 4 copper coins do not march with 1 Yakgani (N# 210227)
These 4 copper coins are in square orientation (both Obv and Rev) whereas for 1 Yakgani (N# 210227) the Obv is in rhombus (with an inner square) and Rev in square orientation.
There are no copper coins listed for Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah in Michael Mitchener - Oriental coins and their values
In N# 155682 GG#D271 equivalent for Mitch is shown as W# 2577.
______________________________
Looking for another coin from Qutb Ud-Din (al-Din) Mubarak coin with the orientation - Obv is in rhombus (with an inner square) and Rev in square - I find GG# D276, Four Gani, 3.6 - 3.7g. While the weight is the same as D#271, Obv does not have an inner square and the lettering is different from GG# D271.
______________________________
A close look at 8 Gani - Qutb Ud Din Mubarak Shah and 1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah shows the two coins are same in orientation, have a central square on Obv and lettering is the same.
______________________________
In conclusion, everything I have found till now points to both these coins being the same one.
The following two coins are the same, but listed under different titles
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces346816.html
I do not know hat happens next, but assume owners of one of these coins will be moved to the other coin, prior to deletion.
bjherbison
Keep: N#181789
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces362776.html
Done.
brismike
Keep - N#375432
Delete - https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces379191.html
Mistakenly added twice.
Thank you. Done.
Trooper8
Trooper8
One that wasn't done by bad referees, so I'm posting it:
Still not resolved after 2 “fixes” in the last 1.5 months.
The first one has been kept, the users moved, and the better photos used. If other changes are appropriate, please submit modification request. Thanks for the reminder.
COINMAN1
The following two coins are the same, but listed under different titles
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces346816.html
I do not know hat happens next, but assume owners of one of these coins will be moved to the other coin, prior to deletion.
Done.
coinmaniacbg
Duplicated coin:
Done. The earlier one has been kept.
Fire Blade5
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces376717.html
Delete: N#375421
This was also noticed by another user and has now been done.
Trooper8
I think these are OK.
According to this Elsen auction description, the type was struck in Prague (Bohemia) with mint marks crown, lion or helmet facing right, and also in Luxembourg with helmet facing left.
https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=837&lot=651
Confusing, and I am not sure the attached auction listings are all correctly assigned.
tdziemia
Trooper8
I think these are OK.
According to this Elsen auction description, the type was struck in Prague (Bohemia) with mint marks crown, lion or helmet facing right, and also in Luewmbourg with helmet facing left.
https://www.numisbids.com/n.php?p=lot&sid=837&lot=651
Confusing, and I am not sure the attached auction listings are all correctly assigned.
The thing is that the Luxembourg coin also has the Prague mint listed and I'm pretty sure the mintmark on the pictures are both the same currently? Or are these two helmets looking in different directions?
As I said … confusing.
Delmonte #384 (Luxembourg) lists all three mint marks: lion, helmet or crown. They do not differentiate helmet left or right. But Delmonte was published in 1964.
The Elsen description suggests some newer findings that differentiate the helmet facing left vs. right (but I agree, I can't tell the difference).
I'm not sure what's in the Bohemia catalog or how recent it is.
In my opinion we should have the Bohemia coin only with Prague mint and the Luxembourg coin only with Luxembourg mint for this to make sense. I will edit a bit.
tdziemia
As I said … confusing.
Delmonte #384 (Luxembourg) lists all three mint marks: lion, helmet or crown. They do not differentiate helmet left or right. But Delmonte was published in 1964.
The Elsen description suggests some newer findings that differentiate the helmet facing left vs. right (but I agree, I can't tell the difference).
I'm not sure what's in the Bohemia catalog or how recent it is.
In my opinion we should have the Bohemia coin only with Prague mint and the Luxembourg coin only with Luxembourg mint for this to make sense. I will edit a bit.
I know only it was a coin meant for international trade. It was also minted during time he was absent from Bohemia and used Bohemia as financial base.
I have edited the Luxembourg listing to provide a picture with the helmet (mint mark) left which is believed to be the mark for coins struck in Luxembourg.
And removed auction listings that call the coin as Bohemia.
Hello.
A duplicated coin:
Keep:
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces379802.html
Best regards
Turi
Duplicated
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces297734.html
Duplicated
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces178425.html
Duplicated
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces178425.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces178426.html
I guess the “pattern” ones are a bit more complete, so this three
Should be moved to were they belong:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/aef-1.html#r_aef774
Example:
Turi
Hello.
A duplicated coin:
Keep:
Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces379802.html
Best regards
Turi
I removed the duplicate, but I think this was created in order to populate the new sections on Afghanistan > States (for the civic coppers), so I will also submit a Modification Request for the one that was kept.
maneeshks
Jarcek
maneeshks
Please merge:
1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah , N# 210227
into
8 Gani - Qutb Ud Din Mubarak Shah, N# 155682
Both have a reference to GG# D271, which is a Billon coin.
The first one (1 Yakgani) shows it as a copper coin. The second one is correctly shown as a Billon coin.
Isn't just first (copper one) wrongly referenced?
The first one (1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah , N# 210227) mentions copper, 2.96g, 14mm, 2.6mm thickness.
There are 4 copper coins listed for Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah in Gordon & Goenka (GG), none of which are listed in Numista catalogue -
a. GG# D280 - Paika - 4.6g
b. GG# D281 - 'Adli (half paika) Hadrat Dar al-Khilafa - 2.2g
c, GG# D282 - 'Adli Qutbabad - 2.2g
d. GG# D283 - Visva (one-fifth paika) - 0.8g
The weights of these 4 copper coins do not march with 1 Yakgani (N# 210227)
These 4 copper coins are in square orientation (both Obv and Rev) whereas for 1 Yakgani (N# 210227) the Obv is in rhombus (with an inner square) and Rev in square orientation.
There are no copper coins listed for Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah in Michael Mitchener - Oriental coins and their values
In N# 155682 GG#D271 equivalent for Mitch is shown as W# 2577.
______________________________
Looking for another coin from Qutb Ud-Din (al-Din) Mubarak coin with the orientation - Obv is in rhombus (with an inner square) and Rev in square - I find GG# D276, Four Gani, 3.6 - 3.7g. While the weight is the same as D#271, Obv does not have an inner square and the lettering is different from GG# D271.
______________________________
A close look at 8 Gani - Qutb Ud Din Mubarak Shah and 1 Yakgani - Qutb Ud-Din Mubarak Shah shows the two coins are same in orientation, have a central square on Obv and lettering is the same.
______________________________
In conclusion, everything I have found till now points to both these coins being the same one.
Hello! Please look into this, it seems to have been overlooked.
Not sure what to do with the Connecticut coppers.? This page has all of them, as they are one type of coin, but with different varieties.
This is to keep:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces352477.html
However, in the coin catalog there are lots of pages for individual Connecticut coppers.
So these are to be deleted:
Other way around, these are different types as far as I can see.
Hi
Can we merge these two duplicates.
Keep: N#59960
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces99234.html
The first lists all the officinas, while the second only has the second officina.
There are 54 people who claim to have the second coin, but I think we should merge them as ‘undetermined’ rather than ‘second officina’ since the mintmark listed for the second coin (SMANT) doesn't exist for this issue and would never mean second officina anyway. (SMANT seems to be an error copied from Wildwinds several times).
Thank you
Please delete the coin
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113649.html
moving the owners to the “undetermined” line of the correct one
It looks like the 1963 2.5 Rupiah Irian Jaya pattern is listed twice, though I'm not 100% sure. I found the double listing when looking for all Irian Jaya coins, when accidently looking for ALL coins.
One under Rupiah (1950-1965): N#168929
One under Rupiah (1962-1971): N#352478
The first listing has good information of sizes that are missing on the second one, also the picture on the first listing is better, however for the second listing the Rupiah years seem to make more sense as other coins are listed under those years as well.
The first misses coin allignment though, while the second listing misses an edge desription. The second has rarity 100.
It seems a merge should be made keeping all the information available, as well as the best pictures and then place the merge under 1962-1971.
The first is listed as KM#PN3, the second as KM#PN2, but I can't find any differences between the images.
I put them together all in one image, left is the second listing (format increased 200%), the right coin is the first listing (format decreased to 40%):

I think the difference is the edge lettering. Album mentions it for PN3: https://www.coinarchives.com/w/lotviewer.php?LotID=6492336&AucID=7532&Lot=1065&Val=0b6d7e969f52ca4420b8a84ba416694f
But not PN2: https://www.sarc.auction/IRIAN-BARAT-AL-2-1-2-rupiah-1963_i20307648
So the two can remain, but PN2 needs an edge description of ‘no lettering’.
John Conduitt
I think the difference is the edge lettering. Album mentions it for PN3: https://www.coinarchives.com/w/lotviewer.php?LotID=6492336&AucID=7532&Lot=1065&Val=0b6d7e969f52ca4420b8a84ba416694f
But not PN2: https://www.sarc.auction/IRIAN-BARAT-AL-2-1-2-rupiah-1963_i20307648
So the two can remain, but PN2 needs an edge description of ‘no lettering’.
The ‘no lettering’ makes sense, unfortunately there is no ‘no lettering’ mentioned in that PN2 link… (At least, I don't see it)
For that reason I cannot send a modification request, more evidence is needed.
cobrapel
Please delete the coin
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113649.html
moving the owners to the “undetermined” line of the correct one
Done.
Dear All,
Can we please mere the below two coins:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces226222.html
Thanks,
Ali
Hello, may I ask to delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces69918.html
and keep:
thank you in advance
Your first link gives a log list of coins.
It looks like this is the coin to remove? https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces69918.html
Oh, sorry. Yes, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces69918.html is the one I would like to remove
Done.
Alderney 2010 Silver Proof Gold plated:
Please delate: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces351827.html
And keep the one: N#367537
Please can we merge:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces37009.html (delete)
and
N#140370
Where the people from the first have the 3rd officina (Γ).
Thank you
What I see now is that, in mine mind, these coins are the same :
N#301685. —- should be deleted
N#19871 — keep!
by the way : is it possible to add a section in Spain with Catalunya (region around Barcelona), where these coins can be registered in ( now it is UNKWON country)??
Erdnussbier
Hello!
A Dublicate that needs to be deleted:
Please keep this coin: N#251397
But delete this one: N#251396
It hopefully shouldnt be an issue since nobody entered the second coin in the collection so far.
Regards Erdnussbier
It is not the same coin page, as can be seen on the different reference numbers listed. BUT the pictures on the second page are indeed wrong. I made a change request with correct pictures.
Hello Trooper!
Thank you very much for the clarification.
This settles the matter.
Regards,
Erdnussbier
Jarcek
All fixed now. Thank you!
These too??
What I see now is that, in mine mind, these coins are the same :
N#301685. —- should be deleted
N#19871 — keep!
by the way : is it possible to add a section in Spain with Catalunya (region around Barcelona), where these coins can be registered in ( now it is UNKWON country)??
Jarcek
All fixed now. Thank you!
These too??
What I see now is that, in mine mind, these coins are the same :
N#301685. —- should be deleted
N#19871 — keep!
by the way : is it possible to add a section in Spain with Catalunya (region around Barcelona), where these coins can be registered in ( now it is UNKWON country)??
Apologies - Here is another duplicate.. 🙄
Keep N#379195
Delete https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces374087.html
27 Members to be moved to the BU in Coincard mintage line please.
Regards - Mike
Duplicate found here … Thanks to Trooper8
Keep this coin … N#167037
Remove 2 mintage lines on this coin … N#66615
The ones relating to Coloured BU Mintage 24,430 & Proof Coloured 3,637
Move the members (5 on BU & 1 on proof) that have coins on those mintage lines coins to the respective mintage lines on the page we are keeping.
Thanks - Mike
The last two requests have been done.
These 2 seem like the same coin to me, they have the same RIC number
One of the new IOM coins was issued in two sets and it was added twice but this is exactly the same coin.
Keep: N#384311
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces374838.html
I just copied info from first one entry to the one that should remain to have all info together, also I added the linę for circulated version (needed to be verified first).
Please move all users from removed entry to the second one. The page to be removed is older and is with more users but has much less info.
For this coin >>> N#80295
Please Delete both of the the mintage lines referencing BU Coloured (23,661 & 10,000 mintage )
Move the 11 members who have the coin on those lines to be deleted
to this coin >>> N#90478
Place them on the 23,661 mintage line please.
Thanks Mike
It seems that I added one coin twice when I recently added multiple coins from IOM& Gibraltar, just noticed it when all request approved:
Keep: N#387811
MMowiec
It seems that I added one coin twice when I recently added multiple coins from IOM& Gibraltar, just noticed it when all request approved:
Keep: N#387811
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces387542.html
Done
Another one doubled page:
Keep: N#381298
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces375809.html
Looks that some users needs to be moved too as both coins are already added to collections.
MMowiec
Another one doubled page:
Keep: N#381298
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces375809.html
Looks that some users needs to be moved too as both coins are already added to collections.
Done, as well as one above with steam train
Done thank you
apuking
A Duplicate here
Please keep
please delete and move owner to the other sheet
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces281473.html
Thank you,
Paul
Done, same user entered both coins
My post from 25th November above still pending.
Mike
Delete all year-lines except one: N#198399
The year-lines are all listed separately here now: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?e=canada_section&r=zodiac&ct=coin&im1=&im2=&tb=y&tc=y&tn=y&tp=y&tt=y&cat=y&ru=&ca=3&no=&v=3&i=&b=&d=&u=&a=&dg=2017&m=&f=&t=&w=&mt=&g=&se=&c=&wi=&sw=&ie=
Mods told me to report this duplicate listing here
Keep:
Delete:
For this coin >>> N#301977
Delete the 1998 Mintage line and move the members who have it to the 1998 Mintage line on
This coin >>> N#389533
This coin has the same reverse but was issued with different obverse designs split over 1998 & 1999
Thanks Mike
Merge:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces247339.html
This looks wrong at first glance, but I strongly believe RIC f***ed up big time and meant that second coin instead. The Roman Empire referee seemed to agree in private messages. And since I remember the Roman Provinces referee once saying that all coins with a RIC number should go into Roman Empire (and strikes in other metals that were forgotten by RIC but not by RPC, into provinces 🤡), I suggest to put the merged entry into the Roman Empire.
If there are further questions about this, please feel free to contact me directly.
to keep: N#355079
to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces389778.html (added the last without proper checking, sorry)
Grinya
to keep: N#355079
to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces389778.html (added the last without proper checking, sorry)
Please fix the reference in the coin to keep
and put years within ruler reign as is in second coin, after that I'll delete duplicated page
done. Thanks for noticing
Grinya
to keep: N#355079
to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces389778.html (added the last without proper checking, sorry)
Done
A duplicate here
please keep
please delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia390183.html
thank you
apuking
A duplicate here
please keep
please delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia390183.html
thank you
Please do not forget this one here.
Second is also wrong as Conder Tokens are listed in Numista in the coins section.
apuking
apuking
A duplicate here
please keep
please delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/exonumia390183.html
thank you
Please do not forget this one here.
Second is also wrong as Conder Tokens are listed in Numista in the coins section.
sorry I do not have rights to delete in exonumia section, so we need @Jarcek or @Compendium here
I think it's a terrible idea that admins just cherry pick (forced or not) the requests in here they process. Because it's not a ticket system, some just get forgotten. Or do you know exactly which requests are still open in here?
I know at least 2.
TheDreadedAce
Mods told me to report this duplicate listing here
Keep:
Delete:
Done.
Trooper8
Delete all year-lines except one: N#198399
The year-lines are all listed separately here now: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?e=canada_section&r=zodiac&ct=coin&im1=&im2=&tb=y&tc=y&tn=y&tp=y&tt=y&cat=y&ru=&ca=3&no=&v=3&i=&b=&d=&u=&a=&dg=2017&m=&f=&t=&w=&mt=&g=&se=&c=&wi=&sw=&ie=
This one is started and will be completed a bit later. It takes some time (I needed to get a lesson in the zodiac signs first, since the symbols are nowhere linked to the names in the listing).
Eventually I will ask for your your list by PM.
Edit: Done.
stefandobyy
These 2 seem like the same coin to me, they have the same RIC number
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces289179.html
Done.
cobrapel
Please delete duplicate
Keep
The auction sale needs to be removed before I can delete the listing, so you will see this as a modification request.
Both above from @al-Bakuvi are fixed.
Please remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces376071.html
please keep: N#383604
please move users from the one that is to be removed to the one that will be continued.
MMowiec
Please remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces376071.html
please keep: N#383604
please move users from the one that is to be removed to the one that will be continued.
Done
Another one batch of duplicated coins, Alice in wonderland 2021 set of 50p:
Keep: N#323261
Remove:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces386257.html
And (2 same pages added even it was already in catalogue)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces386253.html
Keep: N#342617
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces386209.html
Keep: N#331158
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces386250.html
Keep: N#342628
Remove: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces386260.html
Keep: N#342626
Il fuso orario utilizzato è UTC+2:00.
L'ora attuale è 15:38.