Netherlands East Indies: 1/10 gulden, 10 cents, km304, modifications

N#12709

Please give your opinions.

Just a very quick observation…the mint mark cannot go in the mint mark column (yes, I know).  It has to be added to the year line comments in text.  Those privy marks don't exist.  Again, they need to go in the Comment section, or on the year line comments as text, or be added to the “other marks” graphics available to choose from.

That's what compendium is also trying to tell me, and for the moment he's right like you are. Xavier is obviously too busy with other projects…. so graphics can NOT be used as mint marks? 

I'll follow your lead then, when you present the ½ cent changes.

We'll soon have numista in all possible languages (Spanish is hardly used), but our basic needs are kind of, on the back burner.

Sjoelund

…. so graphics can NOT be used as mint marks? 

 

 

Not in the mint mark column on the year lines.  In this case, I think we're OK since the graphic mint mark is attached to the mint section and (again  in this case) applies to all the year lines.

On another subject for these coins, I looked up the actual privy marks used on these coins.

The current halberd is fairly close, but could be better.

Why not just do it this way until the ability to put the correct marks on the year lines is available?

That's the only way for now, so yes, we'll do it like that. I'll still wait and see and see how you do it with the ½ cent! In the meantime, I'll copy my graphs into “future versions” and redo them. Do you know how to make the privy mark graphics? I didn't manage and I don't know why!

Sjoelund

 Do you know how to make the privy mark graphics? I didn't manage and I don't know why!

Sorry, no.  My artistic abilities are ever worse than my linguistic abilities.

The thread about Utrecht marks is here: https://en.numista.com/forum/topic136317.html

I tried, let me know if its pretty enough but I'm not convinced

But we just want a macro image of what is appearing on the coins. No artistry in that, just reality.

Sjoelund

But we just want a macro image of what is appearing on the coins. No artistry in that, just reality.

No we do not want that. Let me explain (again).

We use vectorized drawings instead of pixels photo because it allows a responsive display on all devices and reduces by a lot the weight of the file. Black and White make sense to me to unify marks, whatever the metal on which the're used for instance. Also, using photos would mean displaying copyright for each of them, would not be pretty in the yearlines table…

So an artistic, non-realistic freedom, to save you from copy-right problems of a macro photo? Naturally, the saving of a 1Kb or two here and there is no longer a serious objection.

Just say, we don't want to discuss this any longer, since a decision was taken years ago, and it's still valid, basta.

Sjoelund

So an artistic, non-realistic freedom, to save you from copy-right problems of a macro photo? Naturally, the saving of a 1Kb or two here and there is no longer a serious objection.

 

Just say, we don't want to discuss this any longer, since a decision was taken years ago, and it's still valid, basta.

Not at all. 

- you forgot responsiveness argument

- SVG I produced today are 3 Ko, the photos you took are 16 Kb

- please provide a way to show copyrights per image for a yearlines list of 30 yearlines bearing each 2 or 3 images

That's another discussion, which probably as well took place years ago, is a macro image from a copyrighted image also copyrighted? The artist is now the person making the macro image.