The below coin images are the same but different. Design and date are the same, but different metal. One is plain Zinc, the other is blackened Zinc.
There are three ways that I see that it can be listed.
1. Separate page for each, because of the metal difference.
2. One page, but two lines in the mintage indicating metal difference.
3. One page, one line in the mintage listed as variations exist.
Myself, I would choose #2. BUT, under the rules for listing ... ???
? Format Format Format ? ?
Do not argue with ignorant people .. !! They will drag you down to their level, then pulverize you with experience ...
A page describes a coin type. It may group several variations whenever a small design detail varies and the KM numbers have the same main part, like KM#3.1 and KM#3.2. On the other hand, if the coin uses a different metal, create another page, like KM#3a and KM#3b
Referee for Spain, Iberia (ancient), Suebi Kingdom and Visigothic Kingdom
Cita: zegeriHave you read the "Guidelines..."? Come on! It's easy.
Yes, I have read the "Guidelines...", and English is my native language. BUT >>> I have encountered that all referees do not ref the same. As in, "Rejected, it's Zinc". Some people don't know there is a difference in Blackened Zinc, Black Zinc and Zinc ..
My thoughts were, best to get a consensus of opinion on the "Guidelines..." prior to submitting the page for validation.
Thank You Very Much for the replies...!!!
? Format Format Format ? ?
Do not argue with ignorant people .. !! They will drag you down to their level, then pulverize you with experience ...
I agree with Cerulean on this one. Plated coins MUST be separate from single-metal coins, but coins with modified surfaces (lacquered British pennies) are the same.
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.