Belgium: 25 centime 1916

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces513.html

There are 3 1916 year lines.

The first should have: Dot after date
The second should have: No dot after date
The third is just one too many, so should be deleted!

CR made

Looks to me like should remain 3 listings since I assume one is with dots before and after date.

Will

Cita: "Coinman48"​Looks to me like should remain 3 listings since I assume one is with dots before and after date.
​
​Will

​It stays an assumption. Do you know anybody with a Belgian catalog? We need to know and not assume, I would advice.

My friend, Will the linked illustration serve to back up my assumption? Seems you made an assumption that 1916 did not have dot before and after.

http://numismaclub.com/imgs/a/b/k/o/o/belgium_25_centimes_coin_1916_km_82_2_lgw.jpg

Will

Hi Will,

I have the 1916 with a dot before and after
I have a 1916 with NO dot after
That's to say I have all 2 of them!

YOUR statement:
Quote: "Coinman48"​Looks to me like should remain 3 listings since I assume one is with dots before and after date.
​
BUT I still can't see, what the 3rd line is good for. Please enlighten me on that?



Take care and enjoy our hobby
Ole

I have several Belgian catalogs but they only list the 1916 variants for the 10 Centimes!

However, the photos that are added as a comment with the 25 centimes are proof of a variant with no dot before 1916 and one with no dot achter 1916.

Normal issues have both a dot before AND after the date.
That would be the first year line.
Second line would be 'without dot before 1916' and third line 'without dot after 1916'.

Cita: "Newtony"​I have several Belgian catalogs but they only list the 1916 variants for the 10 Centimes!
​
​However, the photos that are added as a comment with the 25 centimes are proof of a variant with no dot before 1916 and one with no dot achter 1916.
​
​Normal issues have both a dot before AND after the date.
​That would be the first year line.
​Second line would be 'without dot before 1916' and third line 'without dot after 1916'.

​You're right, I had not registered that the first photo was a NO dot before the date.

Cita

CitaYou're right, I had not registered that the first photo was a NO dot before the date.

​Just glad I could help 😄