Perhaps Xavier is awaiting consensus on how Printers should be reflected in the database.
The previous thread ...
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic96668.html ... seemed to have agreement that a "Printer" table should be added to Numista, similar to "Mints" for coins.
-- populated by request to Xavier, containing Names & Codes/Abbreviations
-- perhaps someone could supply him a list in order to seed the database initially, while awaiting consensus.
-- Sample data:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banknote_printers#List
However, the discussion introduced a debate between ...
1. "git 'er done" members like ceh2019 (add me to this crowd: "swimmingly") who want to associate the printer with the year line, so that multiple printers could be associated with one Pick #
2. "expert" members like Oklahoman and BCNumismatics who appear to favor a new page (banknote type) for each additional printer, even if the SCWPM lumps them in one Pick # or "type"
851 instances of Printer data has already been added manually to the "Comments" ...
-- 851 results found (from a search for "Printer" in banknotes)
-- 25,058 total notes in Numista as of today