bjherbison
Iscritto: 28 Lug 2017
Pubblicazioni: 2245
Pubblicato: 3 Dic 2020, 21:45
#
Pubblicato:
#
I see two main ways the die letters are handled:
1) In comments:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/modifier.php?id=162882
2) In the Mint Letters column:
2a) With PM:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/modifier.php?id=10610
2b) Without mentioning PM:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/modifier.php?id=2989
(And I think I've seen other variations but I didn't find any just now.)
What s the best approach to use when modifying listings?
Idolenz
Referente catalogo
Iscritto: 13 Lug 2013
Pubblicazioni: 9579
Pubblicato: 3 Dic 2020, 22:19
#
Pubblicato:
#
In the text without extra description of such a tiny element and as a mint mark.
BCNumismatics
Iscritto: 24 Gen 2009
Pubblicazioni: 3777
Pubblicato: 4 Dic 2020, 13:32
#
Pubblicato:
#
'PM' must be included, as that is the mintmark.
Aidan.
Jarcek
Numista team
Iscritto: 22 Dic 2014
Pubblicazioni: 16166
Pubblicato: 25 Giu 2022, 18:52
#
Pubblicato:
#
Mintmark
- Specify the mint letter(s) in the mintmark field. Other Unicode characters that closely resemble the mintmark may also be used.
- Do not describe mintmarks in words.
- Do not use the mintmark field to record Officinae, die letters, or other types of marks, such as the mintmaster, engraver, or assayer marks.
So in the year line comments they should be.
Catalogue administrator