1 Thaler Mansfeld Bornstedt 1604 [Risolto]

This coin page seems to have multiple mistakes and/or is incomplete.

There are 3 different years/types at PCGS. 1, 2 and 3.
One of which is a 1604 specimen, which I'm not able to add (which is the main reason I'm writing).
Also, every of these 3 has different lettering and other small nuances and therefore different Davenport numbers (there might be even more).
Also, the numista page, as well as the PCGS pages, have the GM mintmark on some coins. In numista, it's in 13/14/15. But the used 08 picture has the GM at the top too. Same with the 04 and 09 at PCGS. It's missing at the 15 version. This doesn't match with the PCGS names, where 04 and 15 should have the mark, but 09 shouldn't.
So I either don't understand this mintmark or there is a huge mash-up on every site.

That 1604 is indeed another type (KM# 7, not yet on Numista), that's why this date obviously isn't on the KM# 9 coin page. That doesn't mean that coin page is incomplete:

Cita: "Trooper8"​​Also, the numista page, as well as the PCGS pages, have the GM mintmark on some coins. It's missing at the 15 version. This doesn't match with the PCGS names, where 15 should have the mark

​There are 4 different Thalers with 1615 GM (KM# 9, KM# 36, KM# 44 and KM# 45), and one 1615 without GM (KM# 35). Except for the KM# 9, none of these are on Numista yet.

But for the KM# 9 you are right, all the dates for this type probably have the mint mark GM but only for the three last years the mint mark is in Krause and Numista takes over a lot of the data in Krause so also the mistakes.

Informed the referee.

Hello,

 

sorry I tried reading through it all but now im a bit confused (Maybe because its still very early in the morning ;) )

What exactly should I correct on the coin sheet listed as KM# 9 N#47247