Is Nepal KM#1061 "Prooflike"? [Risolto]

I recently acquired an example of this Nepalese 1 rupee which is listed as a standard circulation coin but has "Prooflike" in the comments for all three dates. The coin I have, dated 2048 (1991), is nice but I wouldn't call it "prooflike" and the prices suggest this is indeed a standard circulation coin. Can anyone shed any light on this apparent contradiction? If no one has any ideas, I'll request that the three comments should be changed.

Prooflike is what Krause says:

I assumed that's where it must have come from but, as my rather old copy doesn't show this, I wasn't sure. Is it credible, given the prices?

Reading this: https://www.pcgs.com/news/differences-between-proof-and-prooflike-coins it is possible. Just nicely made, that is all.