5 PISO BSP SERIES YEAR 2009

For your reference.. 

in order

die 1, die1, die3.. and the 4th variant tagged by me as “hybrid”. 

please see the short sunrays (no short sunrays can be seen on die1 to die 3), the round sun.

I've tried to set up a new documentation, please verify it?

thats it! that is right! 

thank you.. can you please indicate my surname also? its Louie Art Larita.. thanks a lot! 

I'll make the CR

Shouldn't the title say “1995-2017”?

rsirian1.. I agrre.. 

after this ₱5 piso.. i have an email about the new variants existing here in the philippines  for ₱1 year 1995-2017.. Numista do have only 29 but i do have at least 50+ variants

please consider this also. thanks

rsirian1

Shouldn't the title say “1995-2017”?

Sure

can I ask, when will 2009 die IV be included in the list?

already there, but with the wrong header, the new has not been validated yet, but somebody has to ask for a new 2009 year line, I didn't do that!

I've changed the graphic from obverse to reverse, as it actually should be, thanks rsirian1. Who will take care of the rest (the year-lines)?

thanks for changing the tagged from obverse to reverse.. thats how it should be.. because we are talking and refering the characteristic of every die that can be found in reverse side and not in the obverse.. 

hope 2009 die 4 can also be indicated in the list soon. thanks Numistmatics! 

or rather can you make it “die”  instead? can we use the die instead of reverse.. that can be seen in 10 piso bsp series.. most of the newbies are mostly got confused about this.. they are looking for the characterics in the obverse side because Obv was indicated in the catalogue.. 

how about this? should you change this also?

has been done:

this is what im talking about

louie art

this is what im talking about

It seems you don't understand that from a CR (Change Request) is issued a certain time lapse is needed before the validation.

ok im sorry.. btw thanks again

Sjoelund

louie art

this is what im talking about

It seems you don't understand that from a CR (Change Request) is issued a certain time lapse is needed before the validation.

I have a problem about this change. The supposed "Die.IV" is actually how die.III should look like for the 5 Piso 2009 coins and it may or may not be a new variant. 

Many explainer videos have been made about the different types of the 5 piso 2009 coin and for die 3 they show the “die.IV” coin which is widely considered as the die.3 variant for 5 piso 2009.

I proabably just can't tell what OP is talking about because of those blurry pics but I have never seen a 5 piso 2009 coin that has the same reverse die.3 of a 5 piso from 2011-2017.

if you cound see.. this new variant.. the SUN with three rays is different from the other SUN of rev3.. example is 2011, 2012 etc. 

another characteristics is that the RAYS are SHORTER than the rev1-rev3. 

louie art

if you cound see.. this new variant.. the SUN with three rays is different from the other SUN of rev3.. example is 2011, 2012 etc. 

 

another characteristics is that the RAYS are SHORTER than the rev1-rev3. 

I could see it yes but my point is; the die.3 of 2009 is how this “variant” should look like and I haven't seen any photos or videos about the 2009 5 piso coin that shows die.3 being similar to that of 2011-2017. I think it's better to list this “variant” as die.3a instead since the die.3 of 2011-2017 came after. 

Just like this: