I suggest that we should break the following Numista coin entry into two separate entries as there is a significant difference between the two sub-types which is seen with the naked eye and so easily noticable and eye-catching so that this allows us to cinsider the two variants as two separate coin types:
They are two different coin types with each its own km#, so as such it's OK in numista, but where you're right is that in the references it should be km2.1 / km2.2 and km2.3 and not the NON existing km2! For this you can make a simple CR and put it right.
Well, okay, we can change the KM numbers to the right ones BUT my post/reuqest is about splitting the two types into two separate Numista entries, the design is different on both which is visible with the naked eye.