Replacement notes; line or not?

I have seen an US note with replacement note lines, the so called star-notes. I can't see in the guidlines if these should have their own line. I'm asking not because of the US note, but because the Danish series of Portraits & Landscapes features replacement notes. Siegs Sedddelkatalog 2014 have a list of a lot of them and I can provide pictures, if needed. Replacement notes are also mentioned and explained on the individual pages for the notes of this series.

Since there exist different versions of Danish replacement notes, I want an idea of how to do it best..?

I'll also request guidlines more generally for replacement notes. Are they just like the speciment and unsigned remainder notes? 🤔

The Amarican with replement note lines:

N#201837

The  serie I'm mentioning:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/index.php?ct=banknote&se=Kronesedlerne+5th+issue+-+Portrait+and+landscape&e=danemark

One Danish note with a replacement note line and as an example:

N#208731

I would say, yes, replacement notes get their own line.

Many collectors collect the standard note and the replacement.

Hibernia

I would say, yes, replacement notes get their own line.

 

Many collectors collect the standard note and the replacement.

How is the best way to add them then? 

For instance, should it say 

A0-0K?

A0 replamentnote 0K?

Or how?

It's only the sufix which make it a replament note. A0XX0J for entire sheets and 0K for individual notes being replaced.

There is also the peculiarity of the notes from 1951 - 1959 all have the year (19)50 as issue. The notes from 1960 -1974 have the actual year of issue.

I just had a quick look at SCWPM.

Replacement notes use a suffix OJ or OK. As OK replacements are for single note replacements [this is quite an advanced replacement note system for the 1950s. Irish replacement notes do not differentiate between the sheet and single replacements, though it is possible to identify both].

Anyway, you should have a line each for the OJ and OK. they are different, I would collect an example of each.

Yes I get that. What I'm in doubt of is what to write in the lines? 🤔

Should the year be ND or 1950 or something 3rd?

Should the comment be “A0 replecemennote 0J" or “A0 (19)50 0J” or any better way?

That's what I'm in doubt of/need advice on :)

I would put ‘replacement note, suffix OJ’

Hibernia

I would put ‘replacement note, suffix OJ’

So only one line with “Replacement note, suffic 0J” and “Replacement note, suffic 0K”?

The prefix can also be relevant.

I tought today, it could be written as

"A0 (19)50 0J, replacementnote" with the ND year line 1950

And for notes after 1959 the actual year like:

“C3 (19)60 0J, replacementnote” with the year being 1960

If you are mentioning the prefix as well as the suffix to identify the replacement note, you might be making it too specific. The prefix presumably runs C2, C3, C4 etc. However, the letter C does not necessarily identify the replacement, it is the suffix which identifies the replacement, so the prefix is incidental.

Do bear in mind that I don't know this series of notes at all – my only info comes from the scwpm listing of them!

Here is a page from SIEGs Seddelkatalog 2014, for the 5 Kroner note. I think your toughts of being too specific could be right, since 0K are only for single notes. But the years are still different, sooo..? 🤔

Looking at the catalogue, if i were collecting those the way I collect Irish notes, I would be collecting an example of each prefix - suffix combination, starting with the years. So, yes, the years matter. A line for each year; a line for OJ and OK separately when they both occur for a specific year.

I tried to see how it would work with the 5 Kroner note, since that's one of the shorter lists. Have a look and let me know what you think :)

N#206837

I also talked with one (far from a representativ sample, I know) Danish collector, who prefered one of each combination too.

That listing for the 5 is extensive, for one of the shorter lists. I wonder if it may be slipping into too much detail.

It might be worth considering a shortening of it a bit by grouping the years where feasible, to give: something like:

A0, A1, A2 prefix - OK suffix. Replacement, issued in 1952.

Are there any images of the replacement notes available to see?