Duplicate - 1/2 Groat of Sigismund I the Old, Poland or Lithuania [Risolto]

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces35049.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63424.html

N#130413

Two Lithuanian pages with mintage years split. I can't spot any difference between two apart from years. One Polish page with all mintage years combined.

S. Sajauskas, D. Kaubrys „Lietuvos Didžiosios kunigaikštystės numizmatika“ –  Vilnius, 1993 pages 68-84 has three variants:

1. normal variant from 1508 to 1529 with mix of gothic and renaissance script.

2. gothic script from 1512 to 1516 (year uses only two last digits)

3. Renaissance script from 1528 to 1529 with V mint mark below rider.

every variant has multiple engraver marks and lettering or year errors

I would keep them all together (added: of course as Lithuania). 

Maybe in this case we keep the listing with all the Kop. references, make the titles and descriptions consistent with the other Lithuania listings, and move the users over from the other two (and eventually look for examples/photos where there are multiple Kop references for a date)?  

Your choice how to merge them. Mintage was not consistent at those times and any description will have variations.

@tdziemia is this request finished?

Not yet.  I will work on it now (very messy).

tdziemia

Not yet.  I will work on it now (very messy).

Thanks!!

Completed. 

FOR  ANY MEMBERS FOLLOWING THE THREAD WHO HAVE ONE OF THESE COINS:

The members collections were moved out of the date lines in these listings:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces35049.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces63424.html

and onto the date line for the most common subtype of each date in this one:

N#130413 

So, if your coin is a less common subtype, you will need to move it to the appropriate line.

At the same time, photos have been added for more of the Kopicki types to help with identification (this will continue)