Hi, a couple months ago we dicussed wether some banknotes of the BPSR should be merged or not. We didnt reach a concensus about the 100r, hence the new thread.
If we follow the same path of giving each watermark/paper color diference an individual entry, like we did with the smaller denominations then we would have 5 different 100r ruble entries.

РУССКОГО ТУРКЕСТАНА,
БУХАРЫ И ХОРЕЗМА. Кузнецов Александр Юрьевич
I think this is unecessary because this is a single issue (like the previous denominations), these are just varieties. There are many numista entries for banknotes that deal with these varieties the way they should be dealt with; just list them all in the varieties section.
Before Bukhara i had been dealing with varieties in the aformentioned way, approved, with no issues. Bukhara wouldve been the same, but whoever wrote the SCWPM (the catalogued used as bluprint for the creation of the russian civil war section) decided to split them, and they didnt even did it right. otherwise they wouldve listed 5 entries for 100r.
In face of better and more accurate catalogues why are we still following the SCWPM? They didnt fully know or cared what they were doing regarding russian civil war, and it shows.
https://en.numista.com/232825
N#232816