So why would the French members get upset? Surely if someone can identify the coin, it's far better to go into the correct category than it is to sit in the unidentified category.
If you know what it is, just modify whatever you need to modify. SIMPLE.
I did that with a bunch of Austrian, Bohemian and Hungarian coins. If you have the reasoning, bear the conflict for God's sake!
Cita: imrehIf you know what it is, just modify whatever you need to modify. SIMPLE.
I did that with a bunch of Austrian, Bohemian and Hungarian coins. If you have the reasoning, bear the conflict for God's sake!
But I didn't know what it was. I figured it was British but apparently it's Irish
I have started to translate some of them, so something could be done.
If you take a look at the French version (which was almost exactly the same), about 80% of the sheets are verified. It's only the English side lagging.
Catalogue referee for British, English and Scottish coins.
Le référent pour des pièces britannique, anglais et écossais.
Cita: manxcat12I have started to translate some of them, so something could be done.
If you take a look at the French version (which was almost exactly the same), about 80% of the sheets are verified. It's only the English side lagging.
If there would be a decision on how they should look, what is the convention of documenting them, etc.
It requires STRUCTURAL changes as a minimum AND alternative catalog numbers. (RIC and SEAR)
None of them can be done without Xavier, so I think it is hopeless.
An angry message by me, too. Don't you dare to...
@Manxcat12: that was me you received your messages from for "not putting back coins in the catalog
which have errors or are too incomplete to identify them.
No really. Unidentified coins are in the unknown section for a reason. Otherwise it will all end
up in a mess. That's why the English side looks so clean and polished.