From the low countries, a 1791 stiver (the Dutch say 'stuiver') from Zeeland, a Dutch province of 'islands in the stream' (from the Rhine up north to the Schelde down south). These low denominations used to be coined in silver (0.58 fine) until the mid 19th century.
Cita: GwydeFrom the low countries, a 1791 stiver (the Dutch say 'stuiver') from Zeeland, a Dutch province of 'islands in the stream' (from the Rhine up north to the Schelde down south). These low denominations used to be coined in silver (0.58 fine) until the mid 19th century.
Nice coin! This particular coin we call in the Netherlands a 'bezemstuiver' (or 'broomstiver' as you probably would say in English), because people thought the arrows on the back resembled a broom.
"For by telling them of many things without teaching them you will make them seem to know much, while for the most part they know nothing"
-Plato
Belgian confederation, 1790, 2 Liards (insurrection coinage).
Joseph II, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, was not beloved by the entire population of the Austrian Netherlands. His liberal ideas were opposed by the still very mighty clergy. His failure to open up the Schelde to facilitate trade through the Antwerp port were not appreciated by the merchant and craftmen class either. A rebellion surged in 1790 as Joseph II was in bad health. The few Austrian troops, after being unable to settle any external conflict with neighbouring revolutionary France or the Netherlands, could not deal with the rebellion either and had to withdraw.
Though short-lived, the temporary insurrection government council managed to restart coinage using its own design, but leaving the prior Austrian coinage system largely unchanged.
The reverse left has the text changed (but keeps using Latin for the legend)
The obverse changes the emperor for a heraldic lion, holding a staff with a hat on. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3869.html
Gwyde,
Many thanks for showing your beatiful thalers, nice photos too!
I'll post a few Madonnenthalers later in September but they all have horrible adjustment marks on the reverse.
Any time I find a better specimen at a reasonable price it generally turns out to be a restrike, or even a replica...
An excellent grade you've got there for your ½ Penny, Roy. Congrats.
A difficult choice for 1789 (soon there will be years with nothing to choose from). A quarter Kronenthaler has the same design as its larger brethern. You've seen a couple of those and I've got another Joseph II left: opting out on this one. My 1789 liard is completely worn out, that leaves me with an Utrecht duit (Dutch Republic). There were 8 duit to the stiver (stuiver in Dutch). Yet in the Dutch East Indies, there were only 4 'VOC' duit to the stiver. These 'VOC' duit coins were not legal tender in the Netherlands. The obverse on the right is upside-down, sorry.
Kronenthaler 1788, minted in Kremnitz (mintmark B on the obverse). The edge reads 'Virtute et Exemplo' (By virtue and example), the personal motto of Joseph II, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire. The legends on the obverse and reverse were not altered by his successors.
Obverse:
Reverse:
The Kronenthaler was the currency unit of the Holy Roman Empire, yet it was mainly used outside Austria and also as trade currency. The Kronenthaler had a 9 thaler footage (meaning 9 Kronenthalers were minted using the silver weight of the -standard- Cologne Mark).
The Konventionsthaler used in Austria had a thaler footage of 10. The popular '1780' Maria Theresia Thaler restrikes also are of this type.
This is the only 1785 coin that I have so I thought I would put it on before disappearing for a week.
Roy
1785 Sadinia - 1 Soldo - Vittorio Amedeo III
Billon – 1.56 g – ø 20 mm - KM# 66 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces48577.html
Soooo, no-one had a 1783 for yesterday? Do we wait for a 1783 coin to show up?
There was some discussion around the year 1848 in this thread but no clear consensus.
Running the risk of breaking the rules I present:
I think hardly any of us had a thread like this in mind when starting or building a coin collection. My 18th century coins tend to get clustered around or at number of years. Nothing to show in the early 1780's, unless a MT Thaler "1780", probably minted in the mid-20th century. (I will leave it aside.) Soon two out of three coins in the 1770's date 1774. There's another cluster upcoming in the early 1750's and soon after I may take a sabbatical leave from this thread to return in the late 17th century for the sparsely spread last few dated coins.
No 1781s?
I agree with Gwyde, posting Maria Theresia thalers isn't much fun and I couldn't tell an old version from a modern restrike anyway.
But I can show you this magnificent fake: magnetic, 18 grams, ø 36 mm, half the text missing and a reeded edge!
I bought it in a lot of authentic coins and the seller was embarrassed no end when I pointed out this one and gave me a substantial discount on the lot.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Its a restrike, but I will add it anyway 1780 - 1 Thaler - Maria Theresia
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ― Isaac Asimov
Blog : https://parimalscoincollection.blogspot.com
1778 Hamburg - 1 Schilling Courant - Josef II
Silver (.375) – 1.08 g - KM# 456 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces40976.html
Very worn but it is the only 1778 coin that I have, but I have posted it to keep the chain going.
Hopefully someone will have a better example of a 1778 coin.
Roy
The multi-million mintages from 1749-1752 satisfied the demand for small copper change during decades. Only from 1776 onward, new liards were minted with an elderly Maria Theresia on the obverse. There were 216 liards to the Kronenthaler. The liard was worth about a farthing.
1776 Brazil - 40 Réis - José I Countermarked 20 Réis, KM#175.1
Copper – 14.5 g – ø 35.7 mm - KM# 280 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces48390.html
The host coin is dated 1776 so I have bent the rules and submitted it
Roy
Welcome back Fourmack. I thought you would be placing the farthing on so I went for the halfpenny.
Roy
1775 UK - ½ Penny - George III
Copper – 6.3 g – ø 27 mm - KM# 601 https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5335.html
I've got four coins from the 1770's in my collection, but they only cover the years 1774 and 1777.
Roy facilitated my choice last Tuesday by posting the 2 liard.
Now I need to choose between a Maria Theresia Kronenthaler and a Bavarian Madonnenthaler. We haven't seen any of those yet, so I go for the 1774 Madonnenthaler:
1774 - India Mughal Empire - Shah Alam II (Shahjahanabad mint)
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom." ― Isaac Asimov
Blog : https://parimalscoincollection.blogspot.com
Gwyde posted a much nicer Madonnenthaler yesterday so this one is kind of pointless.
But, what about these adjustment marks on the reverse?
I just find it hard to fathom that they weighed each newly minted coin, found some overweight, and then put a great big file to this beautiful surface and just scraped the excess off! Truly brutal!
Gwyde posted a much nicer Madonnenthaler yesterday so this one is kind of pointless.
But, what about these adjustment marks on the reverse?
I just find it hard to fathom that they weighed each newly minted coin, found some overweight, and then put a great big file to this beautiful surface and just scraped the excess off! Truly brutal!
Silver rounds were weighed for as long as the adjustment precision of the average weight and the standard deviation of the production facility made some part of the blanks exceed the tolerance limits required. Underweight or overweight blanks would generally be sent for remelting; only on slightly overweight blanks adjustment marks would be applied on one side only, before striking the coin. The operators at the mint took care of those marks to appear on the reverse (mint side) rather than the obverse.
Adjustment marks do appear on some Kronenthaler, but perhaps only on one out of five or even less. On the Madonnenthaler it seems the case on every second one. In Bavaria they either had their production process less well under control, or they set their tolerance limits too tight for an 18th century 'state of the art' production facility.
Thanks Gwyde, a good explanation.
I didn't know they were filing the blank before striking.
Didn't this method open a possibility for scammers to file a little silver off good coins akin to clipping or sweating, i.e the very reason edge patterns were introduced?
- We will keep this format (a new day, a new year) going for as long as we are able to. If no coin is posted on one day, the year does NOT advance as we are trying to get one of every date.
- We will keep this format (a new day, a new year) going for as long as we are able to. If no coin is posted on one day, the year does NOT advance as we are trying to get one of every date.
Thanks fourmack. I joined the game late and was not clear on the rules. I take up the sequence from the last post.
Perhaps it's time to start a new thread with the current year at the beginning. This one is 850 posts long and takes forever for all the pictures to load.
"Celui qui combat des monstres doit prendre garde à ne pas devenir monstre lui-même. Si tu contemples longtemps un abîme, l’abîme aussi regarde en toi." N.
Ex-référent/modérateur/administrateur à la retraite
Cita: neilithicPerhaps it's time to start a new thread with the current year at the beginning. This one is 850 posts long and takes forever for all the pictures to load.
I would be happy with your suggestion. I have a coins dated 1767 and will be happy to start the new thread.
Cita: numismaticroyI would be happy with your suggestion. I have a coins dated 1767 and will be happy to start the new thread.
Roy
A good initiative, Roy. It doesn't solve the missing 1770, however. Is that the year have you in mind to start the new thread with?
The only 1770 coin that ever passed through my hands was a Maria-Theresia 20 Kreuzer. (About as common as an 18th century small circulation silver can be. Hence not expensive unless you're choicy on the grade.) It has been swapped for an escalin of an earlier date; I may still have a picture, but I was kind of reluctant to search for it and post. After all it's not my coin anymore.
In order to make a decent link with Roy's fresh thread, we still owe some missing years. It took me a while to buy a 1770 coin. I received it today. The coin is a (low fineness) 1770 silver schilling from the region Mecklenburg-Schwerin in Germany. It only has the name in common with a British shilling: the coin is very thin and rather small (18 mm) for a weight of 1.08 g.
The first time ever I buy a coin in function of the year of issue and probably also the last purchase ever to complete a thread...
And by the way: I'm not even thinking about continuing this thread competing with Roy. If anyone feels a vocation to post a 1769 coin, he may do so. There's some lousy 1769 copper in my collection I still need to take a picture of. If ever we carry on to 1767, let's rename the thread "Mission accomplished"