This entry: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces30739.html includes KM#59.1-59.3. However, KM#59.3 has a different legend on the reverse than the other two (it is DIEV & MON. DROICT). Would it not be better to have KM#59.3 be its own separate entry? When I was trying to identify this coin by the legend it gave no results on numista search, because the legend is different than on the other KM#59s. Only a google search led me to finding out the identity of my coin. Seems like it's a big enough difference to warrant another entry, especially as KM #56.5 has it's own entry and all that differs it from KM#59.2 is slightly different text position, not a completely different legend on one side.
later I will have to ask moderators to move users that are still in 56.1 but need to be moved to 56.2 and 56.3
Regards,
Paul
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Cita: "apuking"Hello,
sorry for the late reply I was away on business trip.
I have started splitting them, still need to add a km#56.2 there is no KM# 56.4?
I just added your catalogue type as well here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces126860.html
later I will have to ask moderators to move users that are still in 56.1 but need to be moved to 56.2 and 56.3
Regards,
Paul
Thank you. There is a KM #56.4, shown in Krause as being only made 1624, but no values provided (so very rare likely). It is similar to KM #56.2 but it has the title of Georg Wilhelm on both sides of the coin. It is supposedly N#10. 110a.
