In one of my local coin shops there's a tray containing 100's of large bronze coins, artfully described as "
Tibetan Temple Tokens, $1 each". They are actually variants of 1 Siao coins from Siam. I was given a handful some time ago so I had the chance to take a close look before getting rid of them. There were two types -
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces11037.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15281.html
Despite being well made, and correct weight / diameter, they were all dated 1884/1885 and so clearly fake (no coins were struck in those years). They were all in the AU/UNC range and nicely toned. Someone went to a lot of trouble to mass produce some high quality fakes but couldn't spend 5 minutes looking up the date range..... doesn't make sense eh?
I think the store owner has it right, they are some kind of religious token and not made to fool collectors hence the deliberately false date. Rather like a more recent and better crafted version of the Presbyterian communion tokens from the 1700's. Or perhaps more accurately the Indian temple tokens made to resemble coins, using wildly mismatched die pairs often from two different coins. You can find plenty of these on ebay, even occasionally on Numista, being tendered by the unscrupulous or the ignorant as "
extremely XXX rare variety".
How several bucketfuls of these ended up in a Florida coin shop as
thanks-for-your-business giveaways is a mystery. I don't question it because asking a dealer about his sources is one of the quickest ways to become png.
So I reckon the answer is yes, but not always for the reasons we expect.
Non illegitimis carborundum est. Excellent advice for all coins.
Make Numismatics Great Again!