Solomon Islands counterfeit [Risolto]

Why is 2006 listed as part of Solomon Islands dates for 2 cents KM# 25 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3483.html) if the comment is made that it is counterfeit and not an official issue? Wouldn't it be better to not include 2006 in date list but instead to make a general comment on the page that 2006 dates are counterfeit and not officially issued? Or is there some doubt and comment should be altered to indicate that some sources indicate 2006 is counterfeit? I see it is included in Krause as of 2016 edition of SCWC 2001-date without comment.

Will

I have the 2006 coin. When you look closely you see a shomehow "chinese" appearance of the queen. Will post pics later.

there are some extra signs as well...

see the nose and the eyes? Not official for sure!!

I agree about it not being official but I don't think it should be listed in the dates where it counts in the statistics of real coins. I would rather see a general Comment made that 2006 is considered counterfeit. Also it seems very curious that such a low value coin would be counterfeited to a huge extent.

Will

Cita: "Coinman48"​I agree about it not being official but I don't think it should be listed in the dates where it counts in the statistics of real coins. I would rather see a general Comment made that 2006 is considered counterfeit. Also it seems very curious that such a low value coin would be counterfeited to a huge extent.
​
​Will

​I agree. Shouldn’t be listed. I learned that those coins are produced solely for collectors and that they sell very well. In my case I bought the coin a while back on eBay for 2 euros and did not know that it was fake.

Removed the year and added the comment that 2006 issue is counterfeit.

Thank you!

Will