Latvia 5 Lati P#43, P#49, P#53 - merge into a single page?

As far as I can tell, these 3 variants of Latvian 5 Lati note are practically the same. They only differ in S/N prefix and suffix as well as slight differences in the foil strip width (narrow or wide). Does anyone have arguments against "merging" these 3 into one page while still keeping proper Pick numbers (as well as proper comments on the datelines)?

For the references: P#43 (does not exist), P#49, P#53 and another helpful link.

If none of the pages have been created I would say to produce a combined listing. But 2 of the 3 pages have already been created. Why not just make the new page? It isnt necessarily wrong to have these as separate or together pages, but it can be time consuming to move all the people over to another listing...but if this nation already has combined listings...

I think it is better to create a page for each different Pick N (in our case - just one P#43). Actually, for the most of notes with slight differences (belong to one country) this work has been already done. So, I suggest to follow the same principle - "different Pick - different page". Just my opinion. Thanks.

Alright, sounds good. If it is not created by the time I get to my Latvian notes, v create one myself.

a little bump to this issue, now all three pages have been created

looking at all the images on banknotemuseum I get the feeling we need either 1 page for all or 2 pages, split halfway the middle pick-number
Seems Pick differentiated them based on the three different signatures

P-43 -1992
main difference with later series is the less dense strip on obverse with 5 hardly sticking out and the thin security strip

P-53 2006, 2007, 2009
these have a denser strip and the number 5 sticks out more, I see no other clear difference

and the middle one P-49 1996, 2001
the 1996 one seems to match the design of P-43 and the 2001 the P-53 design

Please chime in. Is the difference in design of the strip enough for 2 pages? Then for 5 lats P-49 needs to be split between the other two pages. For 10 lats and 20 lats the second page will need to be merged with the third one.
Otherwise we might even choose to merge all three pages, though I vote to keep 2 pages for each value.

Cita: "BramVB"​a little bump to this issue, now all three pages have been created
​
​looking at all the images on banknotemuseum I get the feeling we need either 1 page for all or 2 pages, split halfway the middle pick-number
​Seems Pick differentiated them based on the three different signatures
​
​P-43 -1992
​main difference with later series is the less dense strip on obverse with 5 hardly sticking out and the thin security strip
​
​P-53 2006, 2007, 2009
​these have a denser strip and the number 5 sticks out more, I see no other clear difference
​
​and the middle one P-49 1996, 2001
​the 1996 one seems to match the design of P-43 and the 2001 the P-53 design
​
​Please chime in. Is the difference in design of the strip enough for 2 pages? Then for 5 lats P-49 needs to be split between the other two pages. For 10 lats and 20 lats the second page will need to be merged with the third one.
​Otherwise we might even choose to merge all three pages, though I vote to keep 2 pages for each value.
​

​Security strip seems different for each one (not only large vs thin) but also in terms of feature (inscription, pattern, color).

Change in security feature/strip from P#43 to P#49, then change in strip and design (left part with pattern around the 5) from P#49 to P#53.

If the security strip is enough to differentiate, then we still need to split P#49 as the design of the number "5" is clearly different between 1996 and 2001.

Then we would probably need to move 2001 (49b) to the page of 2006-2007-2009 (53):

43 (1992): low 5, thin strip
49a (1996): low 5, thick strip
49b (2001) + 53 (2006-2007-2009): high 5, thick strip


edit: website with all years and with good enough resolution for most to see security strip, from 2001 to 2009 they look the same to me