Catalog numbers and comments. Again... [Risolto]

I'd like to clarify what is the recommendation with regards to the main catalog numbers and secondary numbers (letters).

I was under an assumption that in most cases there is only one main catalog number (for a particular catalog, obviously) that is provided/displayed as a "Reference Number" under "Overall Information" section. The secondary number/letter goes into the dateline comment, e.g. "s. Specimen" or "P#123s Specimen".

What about this note though? It lists Pick numbers for all variants under "Reference Numbers". Is this what we want to have?

To me it is just a question of consistency. If that's what we like we should do it for all the notes.

As I was listing my. Notes last night, I submitted edits for this. It should be corrected.

Cita: "Oklahoman"​As I was listing my. Notes last night, I submitted edits for this. It should be corrected.

Oh, good! It's already approved. 👍 My request for this was rejected, maybe yours got in before mine and made it obsolete. ✌️