If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
The older sheet seems to list all metal variations
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
I suggested the second page be kept because it's more detailed, I think I made it, and like you said, better photos.
It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
For the Louis-Philippe coin, I do agree to keep the 2nd page (i.e. the one with the lowest id) because it is indeed more detailled.
Of course, members having the 1st one shall be moved to the 2nd one.
For the country, please give me a little bit less than one week, when I come back home, to check if the Gadoury lists this coin as colony or metropolitan France.
Cita: "CassTaylor"
It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.
Cita: "CassTaylor"
It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.
CGB lists it also on France section of their site with Gadoury G.145a reference (see https://www.cgb.fr/essai-de-5-centimes-en-bronze-signature-barre-1840-vg-2917-var-sup60,fmd_309461,a.html). I will thus definitively move this coin to France in Numista as well and I will add the Gadoury reference to the form.
Cita: "CassTaylor"
It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.
CGB lists it also on France section of their site with Gadoury G.145a reference (see https://www.cgb.fr/essai-de-5-centimes-en-bronze-signature-barre-1840-vg-2917-var-sup60,fmd_309461,a.html). I will thus definitively move this coin to France in Numista as well and I will add the Gadoury reference to the form.
Gadoury catalogue should be consulted on that one; and I think difference in dimensions is grounds for a separate page. Maybe keep both of them (in France) and turn one into the page for the 26 mm type?
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
The first one is correct (moderator for Lorraine will easily confirm this).
The second, at a minimum, has the wrong photo (also can be confirmed by moderator for Lorraine).
no. I just add a single coin at a time. It happens maybe 1 out of 30. It is made at the same time as the first one. I did nothing different than any other coin I add.
I made mistakes in inserting these coins at the time of this creation.
I immediately propose to change a single currency to be kept as a reference.
Inserting the various Vives references with the respective mints.
They are actually equal / duplicate images.
I propose to keep only this catalog:
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
First link is a Serez mint, second one is an Edirne mint.
They were both minted in 848 AH (the date is readable on the reverse side) and share the same design.
The orientation of the coin is good on the first link. I guess we can group them under the same page and keep the reverse pictures of both coins in the comment section to help users to determine the mint.
I think we should group them under the same page and add the reverse type of each mint in the comment section.
I can continue for the rest of the section but I prefer waiting for an opinion before continuing.
Ps : the referees seems inactive here as I requested some modification and added another coin one month ago.
Hello.
It seems to me that the participation of the referee in this matter is necessary. First, without a referee making such a change is inconvenient, since he should confirm the change. Secondly, without participation of the referee, such changes are not ethical, in my opinion.
At least I can't see the difference, although the first record seems to have more information.
Are these duplicates? If not, can someone point out a difference? I have one of these, so if there is a difference, I would like to decide which I have.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Cita: "Sulfur"
@theloosehorse,
I will wait for the measurements before doing anything with the first duplicate; the ones after that have been dealt with.
Thank you. The coin has been delivered today and my measurements for it are 38.5mm diameter, 2.9mm thickness and 28.1 grammes weight, therefore I would suggest that this version, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36859.html , would be the one to keep and combine the other one with it. However, my coin is medal alignment so perhaps if combining the pages, seperate date lines would need to be added; one for coin alignment and one for medal alignment? Neil
With that being said, I deleted the images on the KM#478 page.
Now, you say your coin has a medal alignment? According to the pages, the medal alignment should be KM#478. If that one is yours, you could use your coin for the pictures of that page, if you want. But if your coin is actually KM#1062, then yes, I will add a new line for the different alignment.
153286 is the one that should be deleted in my opinion as the photos don't appear to be copper as the listing states the coin would be, plus judging by the rarity index of 100, no-one has one in their collection.