Duplicate listings (coins)

Pubblicazioni di 991

» Accesso rapido all'ultima pubblicazione

Please move owner of this https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143144.html to here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15178.html and then delete the first as its a duplicate.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Cita: "apuking"​Please move owner of this https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143144.html to here https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15178.html and then delete the first as its a duplicate.
​Different metals require different pages.
The older sheet seems to list all metal variations
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Done
Hello,

I recently moved a Congo - Republic commemorative 100 Francs CFA coin to Exonumia, based on the fact that it was moved from KM#3 to X#1 a while back.

Keep:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces137791.html
(can someone also replace the reference number and put "Formerly KM#3" in comments)

Delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces29913.html

Thank you!
Ken6528: done.
CassTaylor: done.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces23417.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces51489.html
Cita: "kommodore"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces23417.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces51489.html
​Thank you, done.
Thank you!
Cita: "Sulfur"​These look like duplicates:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces84485.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces85027.html
​Done!
ROMA AETERNA
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73311.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces121013.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73310.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces119641.html
Cita: "hambi"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73311.html
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces121013.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces73310.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces119641.html

Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Thank You
Cita: "ken6528"​Move from
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77785.html
​Move to
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113096.html
​Delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77785.html
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Hello,

This is the same Essai coin, duplicated in the catalogue:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces71848.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42014.html

I believe the second page should be kept, and moved to France like the first page is right now.
Cita: "CassTaylor"​Hello,

​This is the same Essai coin, duplicated in the catalogue:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces71848.html
​and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42014.html

​I believe the second page should be kept, and moved to France like the first page is right now.
​Hello.
It is interesting to know the opinion of the referee.
The photo on the second page is certainly better.
@Cyrillius

OK, sure thing.

I suggested the second page be kept because it's more detailed, I think I made it, and like you said, better photos. :`

It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
For the Louis-Philippe coin, I do agree to keep the 2nd page (i.e. the one with the lowest id) because it is indeed more detailled.

Of course, members having the 1st one shall be moved to the 2nd one.

For the country, please give me a little bit less than one week, when I come back home, to check if the Gadoury lists this coin as colony or metropolitan France.
This is a duplicate listing
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces103986.html

Of this coin
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143942.html

could you please delete it

thanks
matt
Myeackle: done.
Cita: "Cyrillius"​Myeackle: done.
​thank you!
Cita: "CassTaylor"
​It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.


What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.

CGB lists it also on France section of their site with Gadoury G.145a reference (see https://www.cgb.fr/essai-de-5-centimes-en-bronze-signature-barre-1840-vg-2917-var-sup60,fmd_309461,a.html). I will thus definitively move this coin to France in Numista as well and I will add the Gadoury reference to the form.
Cita: "Shadoko"
Cita: "CassTaylor"
​​It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.


​What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.

​CGB lists it also on France section of their site with Gadoury G.145a reference (see https://www.cgb.fr/essai-de-5-centimes-en-bronze-signature-barre-1840-vg-2917-var-sup60,fmd_309461,a.html). I will thus definitively move this coin to France in Numista as well and I will add the Gadoury reference to the form.
​​
​merci! :`
Cita: "CassTaylor"
Cita: "Shadoko"

Cita: "CassTaylor"
​​​It should be moved to France because despite being the same dimensions as the French colonies coinage of Louis Philippe, these essais "Copper currency reform" are usually attributed to France.
​​
​​
​​
​​What is sure is that the Krause World Coins lists the "1 Décime" coin (same design) in the France section.
​​
​​CGB lists it also on France section of their site with Gadoury G.145a reference (see https://www.cgb.fr/essai-de-5-centimes-en-bronze-signature-barre-1840-vg-2917-var-sup60,fmd_309461,a.html). I will thus definitively move this coin to France in Numista as well and I will add the Gadoury reference to the form.
​​​
​​merci! :`
Well, in the French page (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42014.html) there is only one date line - 1840 and 26 mm.
French colonies (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces71848.html) - 3 date lines.
Thus, there are not enough lines for two dates (or other pages): 1840 27.5 mm; ND (1840) 26 mm.
@Cyrillius, Shadoko

Gadoury catalogue should be consulted on that one; and I think difference in dimensions is grounds for a separate page. Maybe keep both of them (in France) and turn one into the page for the 26 mm type?
Cita: "CassTaylor"​Hello,

​This is the same Essai coin, duplicated in the catalogue:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces71848.html
​and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42014.html

​I believe the second page should be kept, and moved to France like the first page is right now.
Not a real duplicate but rather two different "Essai" coins with I guess wrong pictures. This essai is known with different diameters, different weights, different reverse lettering (wide vs. thin), date on obverse instead of reverse.
2 examples with different references:
https://www.cgb.fr/essai-br-de-5-centimes-1840-vg-2917-spl63,fmd_066449,a.html
https://www.cgb.fr/essai-br-de-5-centimes-1840-vg-2918-spl63,fmd_066450,a.html
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Thank you
Ken6528: done.
Thank you
Cita: "ken6528"​move members from
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces46048.html

​Move to
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces72678.html

​Delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces46048.html
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
thank you
Cita: "ken6528"​move members from year 1974
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113099.html

​Move to year 1974
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113097.html

​Delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113099.html
​Done.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Done. Thank you
Done

Edit: What have I done though - there was a request above this that is not there now 0:)
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
@pejounet
OK, I'll let you sort that one out then.
Still looking for Gadoury catalogue.... :°
Done thank you
Ken6528: done, thank you.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22045.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces85257.html

The first one is correct (moderator for Lorraine will easily confirm this).
The second, at a minimum, has the wrong photo (also can be confirmed by moderator for Lorraine).
Cita: "tdziemia"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22045.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces85257.html

​The first one is correct (moderator for Lorraine will easily confirm this).
​The second, at a minimum, has the wrong photo (also can be confirmed by moderator for Lorraine).
​Hello.
Sorry, but what are they duplicates?
If these pages need to be changed somehow, you just can make a change request. Or you can write a message to the referee.
Referee for Lorraine - https://en.numista.com/echanges/profil.php?id=22251
Referees for Italian states - https://en.numista.com/echanges/profil.php?id=30234, https://en.numista.com/echanges/profil.php?id=52910
Gibgaltar coin KM#489

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces23284.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces133652.html
Follow me: https://www.instagram.com/retrojar/
Coinshunter: done, thank you.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2982.html
Two identical listings on the same page?
Humor is the ability to see three sides to one coin. -Ned Rorem
Cita: "Raibas"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2982.html
​Two identical listings on the same page?
​Hello.
What do you mean? Have you seen the same page somewhere? Or do you mean that the page lists two dates (2000 and 2003)?
Cita: "Cyrillius"
Cita: "Raibas"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2982.html
​​Two identical listings on the same page?
​​Hello.
​What do you mean? Have you seen the same page somewhere? Or do you mean that the page lists two dates (2000 and 2003)?
​I saw the same page a few days ago, but I can’t find it now. Disregard if you like.
Humor is the ability to see three sides to one coin. -Ned Rorem
I believe this coin has a double listing:


5 Florin - Beatrix Shoco Bird 2012:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces56778.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101000.html
Cita: "remy2255"​I believe this coin has a double listing:


​5 Florin - Beatrix Shoco Bird 2012:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces56778.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces101000.html
​Thank you, I made a request to the referee.
Done

Somehow adding a new coin it sometimes make an identical duplicate listing.
Ken6528: done.
Done

It did it again
Do you clone them? :D Removed.
Cita: "Cyrillius"​Do you clone them? :D Removed.
​no. I just add a single coin at a time. It happens maybe 1 out of 30. It is made at the same time as the first one. I did nothing different than any other coin I add.
Done
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces114881.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces46354.html

Keep the second one, the second one is in the right category as most "Złota Polska" coins are situated there.
Sometimes, I dream about Ch- Coins.
Sergiuszwil: done.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9624.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9623.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces39087.html

Same coin : without mintname they share the same references (Vives #2088 / Hazard #1101) as the inscriptions are identical. Many variants exist.

http://www.andalustonegawa.50g.com/almohads1.htm

When the mintname is present it's written at the bottom of one or both sides.
Cycnos: I wrote to the referee, I would like to know his opinion.
Thank you.

Cycnos, simoneo80: done.
Hi everyone

I made mistakes in inserting these coins at the time of this creation.
I immediately propose to change a single currency to be kept as a reference.
Inserting the various Vives references with the respective mints.

They are actually equal / duplicate images.
I propose to keep only this catalog:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9624.html
(I will modify it immediately)

we can delete these others:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9623.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces39087.html

I will immediately insert the links of the coins to be deleted directly on the forum: Jobs for Catalogue Administrators (old thread)

thank you for your cooperation and your advice.
sorry for the errors.

Simo
We have evaluated to keep a single page with all the respective mints and Vives references.
This is because we realized that there were duplicates.

I kindly ask you to move the selection of your coin on the following page:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9624.html

Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience

Simo
Thank You
Done (although the two links are the same). :`
Thank you
Ken6528: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces148224.html deleted.
Duplicate medal

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces119341.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces120985.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Done, thank you.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces130150.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces141934.html

First link is a Serez mint, second one is an Edirne mint.
They were both minted in 848 AH (the date is readable on the reverse side) and share the same design.

The orientation of the coin is good on the first link. I guess we can group them under the same page and keep the reverse pictures of both coins in the comment section to help users to determine the mint.
The akce of Bayezid II share the same design. Only the mint change (lower part of the second pictures)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106431.html (Üsküp : Skopje)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106410.html (Amasya)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106419.html (Edirne)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces42015.html (Kastamonu ??)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106430.html (Kratovo)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces80711.html (Novar : Novo Brdo)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106427.html (Serres).

I think we should group them under the same page and add the reverse type of each mint in the comment section.

I can continue for the rest of the section but I prefer waiting for an opinion before continuing.
Ps : the referees seems inactive here as I requested some modification and added another coin one month ago.
Hello.
It seems to me that the participation of the referee in this matter is necessary. First, without a referee making such a change is inconvenient, since he should confirm the change. Secondly, without participation of the referee, such changes are not ethical, in my opinion.
Duplicate coin:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces148565.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces147863.html
And another one

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces148567.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces149280.html
I just can advise you to ask the referee.
Hi,

It seems that these two are the same coin/token?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces113096.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143832.html

At least I can't see the difference, although the first record seems to have more information.
Are these duplicates? If not, can someone point out a difference? I have one of these, so if there is a difference, I would like to decide which I have.

Thanks,
Alison Vick
Hello.
Please pay attention to the comment (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143832.html): "NOTE GAP Between CO. and OMAHA".
Seems I added a duplicate in the past, please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces108225.html
and delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces106884.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
and one more I found
please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces105860.html
please delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces105854.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Apuking: done.

Edit.
Apuking: done again.
One more I found
Please keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces108554.html
Please delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces117696.html
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Hi

Duplicate coin:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces149280.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces148567.html

Regards, Gustavo
Numista referee coins,  banknotes and exonumia for Argentina, Argentine provinces
I just can advise you to ask the referee.
I'm just communicating that there is a duplicate of coins.
I already asked Oklahoman and there is no answer.
Greetings Gustavo
Numista referee coins,  banknotes and exonumia for Argentina, Argentine provinces
50 Dinars (Iran)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9709.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces145475.html
Cita: "anarchisto"​50 Dinars (Iran)

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9709.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces145475.html
​Hi,
I think These are duplicates.
What about year 1332? I don't know.
Maybe the person who requested the page forgot to include that date. Either way, the duplicate has been deleted. :`
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces151533.html

I meant to reject this duplicate but accidentally pressed 'accept'. Please delete the coin above.

This is the older entry:
https://fr.numista.com/catalogue/pieces80497.html
Done. :)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces149031.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces149034.html

Same type, different regnal year ; pages should merged (same coin, but different years).
Face values are wrong (selling value)
I believe that these two are likely to be duplicate listings. I know there are slight differences in the weight and dimensions, but I imagine that is likely due to differences in the measuring equipment used. I am waiting for delivery of one that I have just purchased and will check its measurements when it arrives so that I can give my opinion of which one would need deleting. https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36859.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces7620.html
Also these coins seem to be duplicates too...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces133653.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces132629.htm
and probably this...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces28533.html
Duchy of Brabant, 1 Sterling "Engelse" of Jean III :
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces82082.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces94858.html

Sames pictures.
One have a catalog reference and the other one not.
@Cycnos,

I sent a request to combine the Ottoman pages; the Brabant one has been deleted.

@theloosehorse,

I will wait for the measurements before doing anything with the first duplicate; the ones after that have been dealt with.
Cita: "Sulfur"
​@theloosehorse,

​I will wait for the measurements before doing anything with the first duplicate; the ones after that have been dealt with.
​Thank you. The coin has been delivered today and my measurements for it are 38.5mm diameter, 2.9mm thickness and 28.1 grammes weight, therefore I would suggest that this version, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces36859.html , would be the one to keep and combine the other one with it. However, my coin is medal alignment so perhaps if combining the pages, seperate date lines would need to be added; one for coin alignment and one for medal alignment? Neil
Actually, upon further investigation, the coins are not duplicates--one page is using the wrong images. Both have different KM#s, but both pages have pictures of KM#1062. Here is how the KM#478 should look:
https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/gibraltar-2.8-ecus-km-478-1993-cuid-1121972-duid-1321415 (there bottom of the busts are different).

With that being said, I deleted the images on the KM#478 page.

Now, you say your coin has a medal alignment? According to the pages, the medal alignment should be KM#478. If that one is yours, you could use your coin for the pictures of that page, if you want. But if your coin is actually KM#1062, then yes, I will add a new line for the different alignment. :`
Ottoman 80 para.
- https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces116002.html -
Duplicate - https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces149031.html -
Done
@VintageCoin,

Good catch! The duplicate has been deleted. :`

@theloosehorse,

Done. ;)
50 Forint 2018: World Wrestling Championships

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces152296.html

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces151598.html
Done. :`
1 Kaserah from the Kashmir Sultanate, Sultan Fath Shah

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45306.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces41796.html

See also this forum topic: https://en.numista.com/forum/topic75445.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces49634.html
Duplicate 2018 year
Anarchisto: wrote a referee asking for a look at these pages.

Kommodore: done, thank you.
Cita: "anarchisto"​ 1 Kaserah from the Kashmir Sultanate, Sultan Fath Shah

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45306.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces41796.html

​See also this forum topic: https://en.numista.com/forum/topic75445.html

They are not exactly duplicates. But similar coins for same ruler with subtle variety in calligraphy. In my opinion they should be kept separate.
“A man without a hobby is only half alive.”
Franklin Delano Roosevelt
Another duplicate ecu.....
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces153286.html seems to be a duplicate of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces143350.html.

153286 is the one that should be deleted in my opinion as the photos don't appear to be copper as the listing states the coin would be, plus judging by the rarity index of 100, no-one has one in their collection.

» Politica del Forum

Il fuso orario utilizzato è UTC+2:00.
L'ora attuale è 20:30.